Both the article and the lecture discuss private fossil ownership. While the article's author says that private fossil ownership should not be allowed several reasons, the speaker claims that a fossil ownership allows private people to own
The article's author insists that many public will lose the interest of fossils. Debating this point, the speaker argues that private fossil ownership will create more interests due to a sense of scarcity. In other words, if it will allow for many people to own private fossils, a mounts of fossils will decrease. And many people will pay attentions to fossils. Thus, most of publics will have more interests about fossils because of private fossil ownership.
According to the article, a important scientific information belonging to fossils will disappear forever due to private fossil ownership. However, the speaker challenges this assertion, saying that more opportunities to finding scientific information will appear because of the ownership of private fossils. If many chance are given to many people, they will seek experts that they want to appreciated their fossils how much have a value of their fossil. And then there are many opportunities to investigate to seek for scientific information.
Finally, the speaker points out that there are more possibilities to destroy fossils. There are more possibility to excavate more fossils which were not excavated on a land. As a result, many people have a opportunity of viewing many fossils due to private fossil ownership.